IT WAS A MAN’S WORLD UNTIL HILLARY CLINTON ENTERED THE BOY’S ROOM

AND TOOK IT LIKE A LITTLE GIRL

BY LISA RICHARDS

NOVEMBER 13, 2007

For decades radical feminists have insisted on being treated equal to men. They have endorsed genderless equality while demanding men treat them no different than men. Yet the moment the equality is bestowed in an all man’s setting, the feministas turn into little girls, stamping their feet and demanding the men stop being mean to them and treat them with the same respect they would treat real ladies.

Hillary Clinton has become one of those cry-babies who insist on using the men’s room, demands to be treated like a man, but crumples into a little girl as soon as men point out she is still a woman and they are going to treat her as such by criticizing what they feel is not strong enough leadership to join the boy’s club.

Ouch.

The October 30, 2007 Democrat Debate was a perfect example of a radical feminist being knocked off her genderless pedestal by men she thought she could become. Rather than treat Senator Clinton like a lady, they treated her like the man she desires to be: the democrat candidates hit her hard with the same comments they would throw at each other and Hillary Clinton couldn’t handle it.

Someone should have told Hillary Clinton the only female democrat candidate is John Edwards. Even he knows it’s a man’s world and has no problem being treated like a lady.

Hillary Clinton’s problem is she, like all radical feminists, think they can be men and want to be men in a man’s world. Yet when the men of the world treat them equally, radicalistas revert back to daddy’s little girl insisting the boys stop picking on them or they’ll tell their father.

During the debate, Madame Romanov’s failures as a Senator and First Lady were pointed out in detail and she could not handle the truth, complaining later that moderator Tim Russert was too tough on her.

When asked about Governor Elliot Spitzer’s insane plan to grant illegal aliens New York State driver’s licenses, which would allow the criminals to vote in the 2008 election, Hillary Clinton refused to give a yes or no answer as to whether she supported Spitzer’s plan or not.  The lack of answer spoke volumes: Clinton will support any means to get the democrat vote, even if it is obtained criminally.

After the debate in which Hillary was trounced on like she does to all in her way, the Senator claimed the thrashing of her record was “the politics of pile-on” by her opponents.

Rather than take the trouncing like the man she is, Hillary ran crying to her genderless Wellesley girls telling them politics is an evil world called the “all boy’s club” Wellesley “prepared” her to join. That would explain the fact Wellesley turns out so many gym teachers.  That also explains why there are no women to be found in politics to this day.

In fact, I have it on good authority that Condoleezza Rice is actually J.C. Watts in drag. That is the reason Congressman Watts left office at the precise moment Condi got her job: Washington wanted to appear women-friendly by having a female head the State Department. Washington tried with Dick Armatige as Madeline Albright, but everyone including Kim Jung IL saw through that disguise.

But Hillary is not giving up on her hopeless attempt to become first female president. Like all failures who can’t make it in a man’s world, Hillary is prepared for her town hall question and answer speeches with prepared-for-the-audience planted questions written by her staff so Hillary can never be caught off guard with questions the scripted politician can’t answer.

No wonder Russert caught Hillary off guard, he didn’t take the baited script Hillary passes out to all who ask her questions.

Can America just envision a Hillary presidency? The entire eight years would be scripted with Helen Thomas and Helen Thomas only asking Hillary the questions at the press conferences. Thus the explanation of why Hillary Clinton has never spoken to Bill O’Reilly or Sean Hannity—they don’t use a script prepared by the interviewee. CNN is glad to whore itself for Hillary’s prepared-in-advance answers.

Hillary Clinton can kiss the presidency goodbye. The presidential boy’s club will remain so until the United States produces it’s very own Margaret Thatcher. And Hillary Clinton is not, nor will she ever be the Iron Lady or any lady.

Note to Hillary Clinton: it will always be a man’s world because God created Adam, a man, first. You will never turn men into women—except John Edwards—so give it up. Radical feminists need to realize they lost their battle long ago and made themselves look like fools. Now men look at them as men and see radical feminists as the joke they are—women trying to grow something between their legs that hangs as bad as their bra-less appendages not even a blind man wants to see.

copyright Lisa Richards 2007

www.lisa-richards.com

E-mail: lisa-richards@lisa-richards.com

CLOSE ENCOUNTERS OF THE HOBBIT KIND

THE IDIOT OF THE WEEK: DENNIS KUCINICH

BY LISA RICHARDS

November 9, 2007

I’ve pretty much come to expect anything to slip out of the mouth of presidential candidates nowadays. They name-call, they caterwaul like spoiled brats, they regale us with tales of their mill workin’ daddies, struggling moms (I’m waiting to hear how they walked twenty miles to school without shoes), gave a hamster mouth-to-mouth resuscitation, got a splinter in the a** in Vietnam in order to become a decorated war hero, met a poor person with one leg, one arm and no teeth because Republicans refuse to let poor people live like humans, and have had to struggle distressfully in an all boys political club. The nauseating list goes on and on to the point one wonders when the mother ship will land and take them all back from whence they came.

And then it does; right in the middle of the Democrat Presidential Debate.

It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to realize Dennis Kucinich is not a normal man. Let’s face it; the man is a Hobbit, which would undoubtedly make Hillary Clinton Sauron. But nonetheless, the man is definitely something from a Tolkien fairy tale. And he apparently lives in a fairy tale world, because Martians have appeared to Dennis Kucinich. 

That’s right; Presidential Candidate Congressman Dennis Kucinich told an audience at a recent Presidential Debate that he has seen UFO’s. Kucinich stated: “It was an unidentified flying object…and I'm also going to move my campaign office to Roswell, New Mexico…and also, you have to keep in mind that Jimmy Carter saw a UFO.”

Oh that really validates the claim with authoritative normality: the anti-American commie-loving Carter sees Martians. Maybe after a couple jars of homemade hooch.

The most authentic source of proof Kucinich has to back his Star Trek claims is none other than the many-lives-lived actress Shirley MacClain. That’s right; Miss MacClain stated Kucinich “saw a gigantic triangular craft, silent and observing him. It hovered for about ten minutes or so and sped away with a speed he [Kucinich] couldn’t comprehend.”

Oh please! Triangular, hovers low, is very silent, flies at very high speed…

Comprehend this you crossed-over imbecile and elfin geek: Stealth Bomber!

This is what’s in charge of the state of Ohio’s lives: a man who believes in Martians. And he’s no Bill Bixby ladies.

No one should be shocked over Kucinich’s close encounters of the loose canon kind. What can one expect from a man who placed an ad in newspapers looking to find a woman for his last presidential run? Shirley’s single, she sees dead people and Kucinich sees UFO’s. It’s a perfect match.

What is crazier is Kucinich is serious. He believes he saw a UFO. He never took into account the military has fighter planes resembling things he so obviously watches and believes on the Sci/Fi channel. Apparently he is vying for the Sci/Fi Convention vote. That would be men his age who live in their mother’s basements with a wardrobe of William Shatner uniforms.

When a college educated democrat makes Ozzy Osborne look clear-headed, it’s time for democrats to shut down their party and come to the realization that it’s over; Rudy’s going to kick their butts back to Mordor.

copyright 2007 Lisa Richards

www.lisa-richards.com

lisa-richards@lisa-richards.com

REMEMBER THE ALAMO:

BECAUSE WASHINGTON HAS FORGOTTEN

BY LISA RICHARDS

OCTOBER 30, 2007

Mexico has officially invaded the U.S. on a political scale. The Mexican Army has crossed U.S. borders with machine guns they use to fire at U.S. Border Guards attempting to prevent illegal aliens and drug smugglers from entering U.S. borders. Worse; the Mexican Army aids and protects illegals, drug smugglers, and human traffickers crossing the borders, and Washington knows.

This violation of Mexico upon the U.S. is an all out military invasion with enough evidence for the Bush  Administration and Washington to call up the National Guard, place them on the borders with orders to shoot to kill every Mexican uniform, drug and human trafficker U.S. troops find invading. There is enough evidence for the U.S. military to go in and help Border Patrol Agents round up every illegal crossing and return them back to Mexico. 

Mexico’s military assault on the U.S. has murdered U.S. Border Guards preventing drug trafficking. What does this say about Mexico’s attitude toward the United States: they hate Americans and have no respect for the U.S as a sovereign nation. And no one is stopping them.

The Mexican Military invasion is nothing new. It did not happen this week and suddenly find its way to my desk-top. Republican Presidential Candidate Tom Tancredo of Colorado has been battling the problem for years with no help from Washington. And he’s not the only American crying fowl while begging Washington to stop Mexico’s assault on the U.S. The Border Patrol also has been begging Washington to order up troops to the border to fight a war against Mexico.

In March of 2003, NewsMax’s Phil Brennan reported that 120 Mexican Military invasions had been documented. According to Brennan, thousands of armed Mexican soldiers helping smuggle drugs into the U.S. The invasions have been going on, noticed, for five years. According to Judicial Watch article “The Unauthorized Crossing of the U.S.—Mexican Border By Mexican Government Personnel,” the time of documenting Mexican Military invasions dates back to 1996.  That’s nearly 12 years of neglect by Capital Hill.

In 2006, Judicial Watch filed for the release of Homeland Security documents detailing 226 Mexican Military raids on the U.S. Nine years worth of military incursions on the U.S. were detailed in the records: maps, assaults on U.S. Border Patrol, Mexican helicopter raids, and Mexican boats smuggling drugs.

Soldier of Fortune Magazine noted Mexican HUMV’s stormed U.S. borders in 2000, firing on United States Border Patrol Police in Texas and California. Border Patrol Agents document and report the incursions, but are not taken seriously by the U.S. Government, who turns a blind eye, ignoring the military raids by Mexico.

There was a time in this nation’s history when an invader was blown out of the water or received a couple of bombs on a couple of their cities. The U.S. Government not only lets Mexicans enter the U.S. at free will while rewarding the gate-crashers with welfare from Washington and driver’s licenses from Elliot Spitzer, Washington has been allowing the Poncho Patrol to invade U.S. borders, gun down U.S. lawmen, and help drug traffickers proliferate drugs and prostitution throughout the nation.

Since the 1965 Hart-Cellar Bill and Ted Kennedy immigration policy for illegal immigrants, this nation has slowly been invaded by people who want nothing to do with American culture and everything to do with taking it from Americans in an effort to transform the U.S. into a dis-United States of Hispanica. The infiltration escalated in the 1990’s as Clinton ignored the serious threat, and then spiraled out of control as President Bush ignored Tom Tancredo’s warnings about U.S. borders being attacked by Mexico.

The only reason Washington chooses to disregard Mexico’s assaults on the United States is there are too many liberals running the government that used to be run by the people. It’s not as if Washington is completely ignorant of the onslaught; newspapers and magazines have been covering the subject for years, giving accurate accounts of every attack lawmen and conservative Legislators have been asking the government to help stop.

Another reason is Vicente Fox and his accusations to Larry King that he and President Bush had been working toward a U.S./Mexican dollar like the Euro. If that’s true, that would unite Mexico to the States. It would also cause chaos and economic ruination for the U.S. Yet it would explain why Every President since the 1965 Kennedy Immigration plan has ignored illegal immigration. It would explain why over the past 16 years illegal immigration numbers have risen to 20 million without deportation.

In 2005, Tom Tancredo told World Net Daily that President Bush needed to confront Mexico and “publicly denounce” the aggression against the U.S. by Mexico. This was after Vicente Fox announced he would sue James Gilchrist and the Minutemen Project if they dared arrest Mexican nationals. Fox threatened the U.S. would be hauled into The Hague for violations of Arizona Proposition 200.

In other words; Mexico has every right to send troops to the U.S. borders, assail U.S. lawmen, cross U.S. borders with drug traffickers, and kill U.S. Border Patrol doing the job Washington hired them to do—stop illegal invasions and attacks.

Making matters worse, the Mexican Army helps illegal aliens cross into U.S. borders by alerting illegals to the whereabouts of the Minutemen, and then directs illegals to areas where there aren’t patrol guards. And Washington has known this for years.

Remember the good old days when foreigners came to America legally by way of Ellis Island. Those who were illegal were sent back. The Europeans who stayed had the most incredible talents and skills—one of which was called honest hard work; the other was called “I don’t take charity.” Thus no welfare doled.

Some will argue illegals do in fact work hard. Yes; one worked extra hard last week setting California on fire. I will argue tax-payers work hard for a living before having to hand over the cloths on their backs every April 15^th to some slug wearing a rug who never pays taxes and never will.

In the meantime, the U.S. is stuck with invader’s children who receive paid-for-by-the-tax-payers educations, healthcare, and housing. The U.S. Military receives lousy pay and not so fabulous medical care and housing. Then again, the U.S. Military are vile terrorists invading poor little Iraq.

The U.S. Military never illegally invaded Iraq. The U.S. legally, justifiably, and congressionally approved, went into Iraq after ignored warnings to Saddam to step down and leave the country he terrorized. Mexico is actually illegally invading and firing upon the U.S. with the blessing from their government.

On October 18, 2007, MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough spoke with journalist Sarah Carter of the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin and T. J. Bonner of the National Border Patrol Council about Mexican incursions in the U.S. Carter reported the FBI concurred the Mexican Military aids drug smugglers and human traffickers, and Washington is aware of the problem.

Bonner told Scarborough the Mexican Military demands U.S. Border Agents to stop firing back at the Mexican raids. Bonner sent a letter to the white House, alerting the President of the seriousness of the situation. Bonner said the only reply was a letter thanking him for the information. He never received help. A few weeks later, one of his agents was “shot up” by the Mexican Military. 

Drug cartels are known to run the Mexican border towns, yet the State Department refuses to act on the threat of terrorism these towns present. Cartels are suspected of paying off the Mexican Military to help smuggle drugs and prostitutes into this nation, further infecting American youth and enslaving young women lured by the possibilities of a better life.

One has to wonder who else the Mexican Military is smuggling into the U.S.

Washington has two wars: one overseas it must stay in for the long haul, fighting to stop Islam from nuking the United States, and the other on the home front fighting Mexico. That is where the National Guard must be called into action.

Stealing American jobs and taxpayer dollars is bad enough; when that foreign military assaults American lawmen, it’s an invasion. If it’s not stopped, Americans will see the American culture and everything this nation was founded on disappear.

copyright 2007 Lisa Richards

www.lisa-richards.com

lisa-richards@lisa-richards.com

THE RESURRECTION OF NIKITA

BY LISA RICHARDS

OCTOBER 22, 2007

When Nikita Khrushchev gave his secret speech to the Twentieth Party Congress of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union on February 25, 1956, it sounded like a man who truly believed in freedom as he denounced Stalin. Khrushchev declared he wanted a “peaceful co-existence” with the United States and Europe.

Even an anonymous audience member didn’t buy it, asking Khrushchev why he never stopped Stalin.  Sound familiar yet? Keep reading; it will.

Reading the old speech I perceive very clever rhetoric. Words designed to make Khrushchev appear the man of the people as he praised the communist Lenin as some kind of folk hero who saved Russia from despair even though the truth is the opposite. Lenin may have been instrumental in ridding Russia from centuries of imperial Czar control, but he ushered in the reign of Soviet Communism, never giving the people the freedom and equality he promised. The manipulative constraints lasted until Gorbachev took control, introducing Glasnost to the people who took to the streets in revolution to communism.

Khrushchev never dissolved communism, nor was he any friend to the U.S.; maybe to Hollywood communists who adored him and “Uncle Joe,” but not to America. Khrushchev worked for Stalin; he did Stalin’s dirty work; he was Stalin’s second hand man turning a blind eye and never speaking up against Stalin’s atrocities, pointed out by that one audience member to the newly elected communist leader.

The truth is, Khrushchev was instrumental in helping Stalin massacre 100 million innocent souls in order to purge the Soviet Union of an unfit race after WWII—Jews.

Khrushchev was involved in those years of bloodshed and continued the Soviet Union of secrecy of lock-step government Stalin invented. No one was free under Khrushchev except those in the Kremlin who did his dirty work. No one in the Soviet Union was free to come and go until Gorbachev came in and gave the presses secret documents exposing the Kremlin’s corruption by pushing Glasnost openness.

Khrushchev was clever: he announced the era of Stalin’s “dictatorship of the proletariat” was over and “the state of the whole people” had begun. It never happened with Nikita. The Soviet Union grew more secretive and destructive toward the U.S. Is any of this ringing a bell? It should.

After Khrushchev gallantly spoke of peace, he turned like the communist he was, pushing the U.S. further into the Cold War: 1. Khrushchev promised economic aid to Afghanistan and Burma only if they swore allegiance and support to the Soviet Union, 2. in 1953, Khrushchev acquired the Hydrogen Bomb thanks to the traitorous American Rosenberg’s, 3. in 1955, The Warsaw pact of military alliance with communist countries against NATO was signed. These countries pledged to use nuclear power against NATO if war broke out, 4. 1957: the Space-Race began against the United States, 5. 1966: Khrushchev launched the Sputnik Satellite, 6. Khrushchev began a propaganda war against the United States and Great Britain.

Does any of this sound presently familiar? Does it echo a bit…oh I don’t know…Putin-esque?

“De-Stalinization” did not usher in capitalism. It did not bring about change for freedom. It didn’t even encompass European socialism—Gorbachev’s blind-sighted belief of a better Soviet Union. Under Khrushchev, communism simply advanced; any country endeavoring to create reform for freedom was brought under control by the Red Army Khrushchev sent in to quell any ideas by Soviets attempting to generate western democracy. Sounds like our pseudo-friend Putin.

Freedom finally came to the U.S.S.R. in 1991 when the Hammer and Sickle communist flag was lowered from atop the Kremlin and the Russian Flag was restored to its proper place. Soviet States broke up and all seemed well until Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin was asked to become acting president by President Boris Yeltsin.  In 2000, Putin won the election after the three month interval serving as acting president.

Putin won high approval ratings for his anti-terror platform and guarantee of economic growth. He held true to his promise and his approval ratings are still 70 to 80% high. But Putin, the man who brought Russia out of debt while cracking down on Chechen terrorists, pretended to be an American ally.

There’s an old saying: if it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, it’s a duck. Putin is a former KGB agent whose job was overseeing communist East Germany. He kept East Germans in line, not letting them leave or speak freely and openly against the Kremlin until 1991 when communism ended.

It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to guess what the KGB did to those who spoke out. They’re not alive to tell anyone what they knew; or they’re too scared to talk. That says it all. Those who do speak out today get a special bowl of soup. Once a KGB Agent, always a KGB Agent.

He may not be a Joseph Stalin terrorist, but Vladimir Putin is no good guy/nice guy America and the west can trust. Putin is in bed with terrorists, defending the Adolf Hitler of today—Iran’s Mahmoud Ahmadinedjad.

That was not Putin’s soul President Bush saw when he looked into Putin’s eyes. Mephistopoles in a Khrushchev suit is more like it.

Putin came to the U.S. after 9/11 pretending to be an ally. The opposite is true: he is the enemy pushing the U.S. into another East/West showdown. Putin is the guy who declared he “longs for the glory days of old Mother Russia.” You mean like Vladimir Lenin and his Bolsheviks; or Czar Nicolas and his imperialism. Or perhaps you simply wish to “bury” us.

On October 16, 2006, Putin declared any attempt by the U.S. to strike Iran is unacceptable to him. According to Putin; “we [American’s] should not even think of making use of force in this [Iranian] region…not only should we [America] reject the use of force, but also the mention of force as a possibility.”

That sounds like a forceful threat from a low-life commie in a turtleneck.

Putin has threatened the U.S. for building defense shields in Europe. The U.S. is placing missile defense shields to protect Eastern Europe against possible Iranian strikes. Why should Putin be against the U.S. trying defending innocent people from Iran? Is it because Putin desires to take down the U.S. as the super power to place Russia in that position?

How very Nikita.

Again, you don’t have to be a rocket scientist to decipher the answer. Putin is a straightforward guy. He makes no bones about his contempt of all things American and his desire to make Russia number one in the world. He’s very upfront about defending Iran against the U.S.

Well, we have one honest communist since Khrushchev, who infamously declared he would “bury” the U.S. At least the true communists admit they hate us, wanting to destroy us, versus the closet commies like Hillary Clinton who pretends to be simple socialist wanting to join the E.U. while pretending she’ll give old people free medicine and $5,000 dollars cash from tax-payers to all the poor babies.

The October 16, 2007 issue of the New York Times made the meeting between Putin and Ahmadinedjad seem like a meeting between two Boy Scouts. Then again the Times love communists and terrorists and would love to see the two thugs take over the world. Then the Times would be the only American newspaper in existence.

Americans watching Putin speak out against us, reading his threats in papers and ignoring what the KGB/FSB communist is silently saying, considering him to be soon gone and the U.S. not threatened are wrong. President Putin is not going anywhere. He has already asked his Prime Minister to resign and take his place so Putin can go back to being Prime Minister of Russia. That keeps Putin in control and his plans to restore “the glory days of old mother Russia” easily accomplished.

Putin is Nikita Khrushchev resurrected.

Putin has taken control of the Russian government, placing it solely back in the Kremlin where he monitors everything. Putin has control of the Russian press, which can not speak freely without punishment. He has control of the Russian media and what they tell the people. Basically, Russian news is pro-Kremlin if one logs onto Russian newspapers. You have to go to the underground sites to get the truth; and how long they’ll last before shut-down occurs is up to Putin. Reporters who expose the Kremlin get a bullet in the head.

Don’t assume for one second Putin is not pushing the west into another Cold War. This is a man who dislikes capitalism and everything it stands for—unless it’s to line his pockets. If the U.S. has to go to war against Iran to stop a madman, Putin will not side with the U.S. He has made it clear he is on the side of terrorists and will defend Iran against the U.S. He doesn’t bother to hide the fact he’s helping Iran acquire nuclear bombs. If that happens, there will have to be war to stop a nuclear holocaust.

Those who think I’m disquieted over nothing ought to remember Nikita Khrushchev was considered an okay guy at first. But he was Stalin’s assassin; he tried to take down the U.S.; he bought stolen U.S. secrets; he threatened to “bury” us. Putin is no different. He was KBG/FSB; he is closing the Russian doors as he threatens the U.S. weekly with an attack if we dare take out the new Hitler on the rise.

copyright 2007 Lisa Richards

www.lisa-richards.com

E-mail: lisa-richards@lisa-richards.com

THE DEFINITION OF TORTURE:

TELLING TERRORISTS TO STOP BEING MEAN

BY LISA RICHARDS

October 16, 2007

“If you will not fight for the right when you can easily win without bloodshed; if you will not fight when your victory will be sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a small chance of survival. There may even be a worse case: you may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves.”
Winston Churchill

My favorite moment in the movie Tombstone is when Kurt Russell’s character Wyatt Earp stands in the middle of the street, rifle waving in the air, shouting to the violent gang known as the Cowboys: “You called down the thunder, well now you’ve got it…you tell them hell’s coming and I’m coming with it!”

And Russell’s character Earp goes on a vengeful hunt, killing the Cowboys for the death of his brother and their terrorizing of Tombstone.

No matter how many times I watch the movie, that one scene with Russell standing in the street shouting those words makes me throw my fist in the air and whoop a big YES!

George W. Bush standing on the World Trade Center rubble pile after 9/11 was Wyatt Earp letting terrorist know he was coming and hell was coming with him. But liberals like Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi and Hillary Clinton don’t like Bush’s Wyatt ways. Bush believes in going after the terrorists and interrogating enemies is a must. To Nancy Pelosi who believes we should not harm the murderers of mankind, interrogation is unconscionable; to Hillary Clinton, it’s called “cow-boy diplomacy.”

On October 5, 2007, President Bush accomplished the impossible; he made comments to the press that actually caused Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi to raise her frozen-in-place forehead: “when we find somebody who may have information regarding a potential attack on America, you bet we’re going to detain them, and you bet we’re going to question them, because the American people expect us to find out information…so we can help protect them. That’s our job.”

Not according to Nancy who seems to be more concerned with the preserving the lives of Islamic murderers than actual human beings. You see, Nancy wants a definition of what Bush considers interrogation.

Well, locking the thugs of earth alone in a room with you Nancy would be considered torture in my book, and perfectly acceptable. They would all commit suicide. Better yet; why not arrest militant gays who invade Catholic Masses? Now that would be intolerantly torturous.

By the way, how could any form of torture be harmful to a race that desires suicide? Islam preaches and teaches death by suicide combined with murder to all non-Muslims. So why would torturing turbanites be so bad? After all, they do love to torture Jews and Christians. Maybe they would enjoy a little reciprocation.

Not in Nancy Pelosi’s book of Face Lifts and Fatwas.

On Sunday October 7, 2007, Fox News’s Chris Wallace interviewed the Speaker of the House on many issues, including Bush’s comments on interrogating the enemy. Bush’s interview two days earlier came as some sort of shock to the woman in charge of Congress.

Apparently, the “longest-serving member of Congress on the intelligence Committee” and ex Officio Leader does not get briefings on secret memos all other members of Congress receive. Pelosi claims she was never briefed in 2005 on any Department of Justice secret memos concerning interrogation. “All I know is what I’ve read in the New York Times.”

Dear fellow Americans, if you are wondering why the Democrat Congress and liberals in general are so screwed up, not doing one thing they claimed they would do since taking control of the House, it’s because the New York Times, not the President of the United States, has been hired to brief the Speaker of the House.

I wonder if that’s how Bill Clinton figured out he actually did have sex with that woman—reading it in the New York Times.

You know, Nancy Pelosi should ask the New York Times where Osama bin Laden is since the Times seems to be her only resource of intelligence and communication.

Oddly enough, on October 9, 2007, the House passed a bill for wiretapping the enemy, but Nancy is worried about interrogating those we find trying to kill us. It might not be kind treatment, and we wouldn’t want to be mean to the bad guys.

Pelosi told Wallace she “appreciates the value of intelligence to protect American people,” and admits she wants the best our CIA and military can get, but Nancy wants the president to understand America must follow “international standards” concerning interrogation. The U.S. must follow the law if the U.S. wants to appear good in the eyes of the world.

Having an excellent reputation is more important than the U.S. making the bad guys tell the CIA where and when the next attack is going to happen.

God forbid we insult the Russians.

So what exactly would Nancy consider torture? Well, according to what she told Wallace, torture would be “a combination of head-slapping, water-boarding, and exposure to extreme temperatures.” “There is a legal definition of torture,” Pelosi told Wallace, “that I believe this would fit,” further stating that the president has been reported in the press as saying the above are not torture, and “I just can’t give you an informative answer on that.”

Once again Nancy Pelosi claims to get her information from the press. Isn’t that what we the people do? Pelosi is the Speaker of the House of Congress and gets her information the way the people do? God help us; this woman is in charge.

To all you voters in California who reelected that woman to Congress, you deserve to be hit so hard in the heads you’re mother’s will feel the pain in their wombs.

Slapping terrorists in the head is not torture. Water-boarding is not torture. The person doesn’t drown; they only think they will. And exposure to extreme temperatures; oh please. I’m from New England. We have 100 degree humid summers instantly followed by chilly autumns, rapidly followed by freezing, damp, cold winters into rainy damp springs. If we new Englanders can handle those extremes, so can the mucks of martyrdom.

I’m so sick and tired of democrat leaders and their liberal ideals of treating all people equal. Terrorists are not equal to human beings. They don’t deserve fair treatment. Terrorist deserve the same as they give—death. If democrats get elected into the White House next year, Gitmo Bay will shut down and every terrorist in there will be set free to wreak havoc upon mankind. If Hillary or the anti-military Obama win the election, Nobel Peace Prizes will be handed out to every Muslim who succeeds in blowing up as many Jews and Christians as possible. If any of the democrat candidates win the election, say goodbye to wire-tapping the enemy and hello to another 9/11. If people allow a democrat to reenter the White House, expect Islam to infiltrate America further with greater freedom granted by liberals who love the enemy, want a socialized union with Mexico and Canada, and a Supreme Court answering to The Hague.

In my last piece I slammed Bush’s catering to Muslims and Ramadan when he should have denounced Islam and invited ex-Muslims to speak out on the evils this enemy is plotting against the world. I will always disagree with that bad move on Bush’s part. Yet despite my being against any Christian or Jew recognizing Muslims as equals and celebrating their holiday of fast and blast, I have to give Bush credit for keeping America safe from another attack. I may disagree with him on immigration and cow-towing to Islam, but he’s tough on terror and we’re safe because he let’s the CIA and military do their job—interrogate the enemy and get information to prevent another blood-bath.

I can’t discount the president on an excellent job fighting the War on Terror. I can discount Nancy Pelosi, because Pelosi is trying her best to block any and all means of extracting information which may prevent Americans from dying at the hands of mankind’s enemy. Pelosi knows better; she is a leader and her job is to protect the people of California and the halls of Congress, which must protect and create laws to protect the American people, not the enemy.

Nancy Pelosi and her fellow democrats—with the exception of the patriotic Joe Lieberman—are trying to reverse U.S. laws and override the Supreme Court to provide amnesty to massacring brutes. On top of that, the face-lifted diva of demoflop is trying to pass a genocide bill. Oh yes; that will definitely prevent another Hitler/Stalin/Saddam/Milosevic/Ahmadinedjad from ever murdering mankind. If Nancy says: no more genocide you naughty boys, evil will obey the Congressional Frisco queen.

Americans need to wise up and realize interrogation of the enemy is essential if we are to survive. Americans must do everything possible to fight Pelosi and legislators who want to protect the nihilistic Barbary’s resurrected and returned. Any Congressman or Senator who would vote down interrogation bills must be voted out of office. That includes Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi who gets all her vital, secret information via the New York Times.

On the up side, San Francisco’s militant gays can desecrate as many Catholic Masses as possible without arrest and interrogation.

copyright 2007 Lisa Richards

www.lisa-richards.com

E-mail: lisa-richards@lisa-richards.com

ATTENTION REVEREND KIRBY CALDWELL:

WOULD YOU PLEASE LAY HANDS ON GEORGE W. BUSH

BY LISA RICHARDS

October 11, 2007

THE OFFICIAL IDIOT OF THE WEEK:

PRESIDENT BUSH

Yes, Bush acted like an idiot this week. Why; he celebrated Ramadan by holding an official Iftaar dinner in honor of Ramadan at the White House.

Christians and Jews of America thank you Mr. President for hosting a dinner to honor the fasting month for terrorists.

Bush thanked the murderers of mankind for visiting the White House by claiming: “we celebrate traditions of Islamic faith, which brings hope and comfort to more than a billion people. For Muslims around the world, the holy month of Ramadan is a special time of prayer and fasting. It is a time for charity and service to those less fortunate. It’s a time to celebrate Islam’s learned and vibrant culture, which has enriched civilization for centuries.”

How nice; starve a little, and then go kill the infidel Jews and Christians.

George W. Bush is an Evangelical Born Again Christian. Like me, his faith is that of believing Jesus Christ—a Jew—is Almighty God and Jews are God’s chosen people because they are the true descendents of Abraham and King David—not the illegitimate ba****d of an Egyptian Ishmael. But Bush has been holding Ramadan celebrations for seven years, something no devout Christian would ever take part in since Allah is not God and Muslims follow and believe in a religion of murder.

Bush has broken that truth and belief by his taking part in a holiday for terrorists. Bush also made a claim that is absolutely false and in need of some serious hands-laying deliverance by the Reverend Kirby Caldwell—the guy who laid hands on Bush at his inauguration.

What did Bush do to get me fired up, shaking my head at him; he said this: “Ramadan is also a good time for Americans of all faiths to reflect on the values we hold in common—including love of family, gratitude to the Almighty, devotion to community, and a commitment to religious liberty.”

That’s not true. Christians and Jews do not worship the same god as Muslims. Muslims worship Allah, the pagan god of Muhammad’s pagan tribe. Muhammad needed a god for his new found-lying-on-a-cave-floor religion to get his tribe to follow him, so he told his tribe their fake pagan god Allah was Almighty God.  Those who refused to follow were beheaded by Muhammad.

What a vibrant culture of love!

Jesus never forced conversion. He said his sheep would hear his voice. He also told his apostles if people did not accept his teachings, just walk away. And Jesus never mentioned Allah being his father.

Nowhere in the Bible or Torah—the first five books of the Holy Bible—will anyone find Allah listed next to Jehovah, Yahweh, and all Hebrew names for Almighty God. That’s because Allah does not exist.

Also, Almighty God does not tell people to take up arms and kill off humanity if they don’t convert to Judaism. Yes, Jews went to war in Biblical times, but it was after they were brutally attacked by the violent destroyers of mankind the world is still fighting today. Now they are called Muslims, and they hate all non-Muslims—including Bush.

So no Mr. President, we do not worship the same god, nor do we have common values with Muslims. Muslims hate mankind and want every non-Muslim dead. Their Qur’an dictates this: “Smite the necks of the unbelievers” (Qur’an 47:4), “Those who reject Islam are the vilest of creatures” (Qur’an 98:6), “And slay them wherever ye find them, and drive them out of the places whence they drove you out, for persecution is worse than death” (Qur’an 2:191), “Allah hath purchased of the believers their persons and their goods; for theirs in return is the garden of paradise: they fight in his cause, and slay and are slain: a promise binding on him in truth” (Qur’an 9:111).

The above says to lop off the heads of non-Muslims; every non-Muslim is vile; slay every non-Muslim in existence; force them out of their countries by taking over; and kill all non-Muslims while committing suicide in order to get to heaven.

This is what president Bush celebrated when he celebrated Ramadan: death.

These so-called loving people of a so-called hijacked religion of so-called peace refuse to apologize for 9/11. Whenever Muslims are interviewed and confronted on the issue of their violent religion’s practice, they skirt the issue and say Islam teaches love and respect; Islam is about peace. Then Muslims try to turn the tables on Christians and Jews by saying the Bible is full of violence. Again; Jews never started those wars recorded in the Bible; the ancestors of today’s Muslims attacked Jews who had no choice but to fight back.

Atheists, Muslims and their liberal supporters will insist that’s not true. Of course, none of the three know how to read.

President Bush does know how to read; he does know exactly how evil Islam is and what it has done to mankind; Bush saw what that religion dictates when he visited the burning remains of the World Trade Center and Pentagon; Bush knows what the Qur’an states and yet he continues to cow-tow cater to Muslims. This is called being dangerously Politically Correct.

Mr. President, you don’t allow the murderers of mankind into the White House. The White House belongs to the citizens of the United States. That house is ours and those grim reaper gowned goons hate America. They will never chose America over Islam; they choose Islam above all—including their children they send off to homicide bomb Jews with exploding backpacks.

As a Christian, I’m taught to put Jesus Christ first, and in doing so, it teaches me I must put America first, never a religion or church. Bush is not doing that when he hosts a celebration in which Muslims fast for a month before going back to committing murder upon humanity.

Bush needs to stand up to these thugs of the world just as Prime Minister Howard of Australia did: Howard told all Muslims who do not put Australia first and become loyal Australians to get out of that nation. Bush needs to do the same to Muslims in America: America first or Islam; make a choice or get out.

What’s next Mr. President; offering Muslims 99% of the United States?

copyright 2007 Lisa Richards

www.lisa-richards.com

E-mail: lisa-richards@lisa-richards.com

DEMOCRATICALLY INSANE

BY LISA RICHARDS

October 7, 2007

Voting democrats into the White House would be akin unlocking the doors off padded cells in an insane asylum: you don’t let crazies loose to mingle amongst normal human beings.

September 26, 2007’s Dartmouth, New Hampshire Democrat Debate was absolute proof America can not afford to have lunatics named Clinton, Edwards, or Obama running the country. Each one wants to pull troops killing the murderers of humanity out of Iraq, only leaving a small number to guard the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad.

Oh, that will protect our homeland from Islamic loons plotting to come to the States to kill us all. Yes, let’s fight them on U.S. soil versus Iraqi soil. 9/11 was not explosive enough. Not enough people died to satisfy liberals. We need a really heavy bloodbath, like say, 30 million Americans dead for liberals to say: gee, ya think maybe staying in Iraq and fighting the freaks there is better than New York, Boston, Washington, L.A., San Francisco, Chicago, Phoenix, Miami, Atlanta, Dallas, Fort Worth, Minneapolis, Seattle, Newark, Detroit, and all the places in between?

Liberals are the very definition of insanity. Anyone who wants to stop killing evil where evil dwells and put America in the position of evil returning for another bombing is an insalubrious idiot.

In the words of the late great General George S. Patton: “Sure, we want to go home. We want this war over with. The quickest way to get it over with is to go get the bastards who started it. The quicker they are whipped, the quicker we can go home. The shortest way home is through Berlin and Tokyo. And when we get to Berlin, I am personally going to shoot that paper hanging son-of-a-b***h Hitler. Just like I'd shoot a snake!”

And that is exactly what we need to keep doing to the enemy—shoot them like the snakes they are. And do it on Iraqi soil, not U.S. soil.

But that’s not what Hillary, Obama and Edwards want. They want to pull troops out so fast; the enemy will fly to the States right behind the troops flying home. Why; because dems think war is wrong. Peace through strength is unfair to terrorists; fighting terrorists is intolerant. Not to mention liberal loons hate the military and America, so another 9/11 would make liberals happy.

The more destruction to America, the better.

Of course democrats are less interested in the War on Terror and more interested in taking Rush Limbaugh’s accurate account of Jessie Macbeth (that’s not his real name; he’s an Arab named Adam Al-Zaid) being a “phony soldier” out of context. I guess if a person pretends to have fought in the Gulf War and is caught lying about ever serving in the war, and someone has the guts to call the liar what he is—a phony—the Congress and Senate must hold floor debates on whether or not to ban Rush Limbaugh and run him out of town on a rail.

The next thing you know, democrat debates will be about whether or not Rush Limbaugh should be allowed to speak and live amongst the public. That’s how insane democrats are. They have nothing to talk about; no plan for the war or a successful pull-out, so they must attack the number one conservative commentary in America like school children fighting in a sandbox.

Can you imagine what Washington would look like under a Hillary White House? First of all, Bill would be the official First Whore with an office in the East Wing designated the Red-light Romper Room. Second, Hillary would go out of her way to find an old lesbian Jew for Vice President to grab the Jewish and lesbian votes.

John Edwards would simply purchase a three-way mirror as his V.P.

Let’s look at how Foreign Policy would be run: Jane Fonda would be elected Secretary of the State since she’s so good at dealing with foreign leaders—especially the enemy. Susan Sarandon would be appointed Secretary of Defense since she’s so brilliant when it comes to Military Science.

Next, George Soros would be Treasury Secretary since he’s so good at hijacking money for dems. Hugh Rodham would be appointed to the Federal Reserve since he’s a genius when it comes to handling money; Denise Rich would be put in charge of Lincoln Bedroom sales; Patricia Ireland would be appointed—without nomination—to the Supreme Court; Angela Davis would be appointed Attorney General, since, like Janet Reno, she has no respect for law enforcement or killing innocent people.

Forget finding a White House Press Secretary; Hillary will simply ask the First Whore to give the daily press reports since he’s a suck-up for lights, cameras and flashbulbs. Plus, he’s the darling of the liberal White House Press Corps who adored and kissed his feet for eight years in the Rose Garden.

As for the Department of Energy, well Hillary would simply appoint the only oilman liberals love: Hugo Chaves. Since Vicente Fox is out of a job, Hillary could appoint the Mexican head of the Department of Landscaping.  

I’m being funny, but I’m also being serious. Think about a Hillary White House and the kind of people she would have helping her control and rule the country.

And don’t think Obama, whose name rhymes with Osama, would be any better. Obama is only high on the candidate list because Oprah tells her dull-minded fans to vote for a man whose church is a black supremacist church. Boy, wouldn’t that be nice as president. Why not just elect David Duke?

And now Obama has removed his flag lapel pin. Why; oh that one is easy to answer: Obamba hates the flag, has no respect for the military and wants the anti-war crowd vote. What a good American.

If the insanocrats win, say goodbye to your freedoms people. Say goodbye to wiretapping Muslims planning to blow up America; say goodbye to Conservative Talk Radio, free speech to conservatives, Halloween, Thanksgiving, Christmas, Hanukkah and Easter displays, and all non-Muslim celebrations in public places for eight years, and hello to an Islamic/Ramadan/dishrag-wearing/forced Muslim prayer on Christian and Jewish kids in school, takeover by way of liberals. 

Under Democrats, Hajj-athons would replace the National Day of prayer. And if readers think 20 million illegals is bad, under democreeps America would become bilingual, allowing complete and full entrance to all Mexicans with no more border guards to stop them from invading.

And guns would be confiscated as democreeps dismantle the Second Amendment.

Democrats are insane—with the exception of Zell Miller and Joe Lieberman. Democrats want America to become a French colony of Spanish-speaking landscapers. If dems ever get their way, the U.S. would join the E.U. as a one world government. If you think that’s just hyperbole, look up Hillary and Kerry’s sentiments toward Europe. Look at how Justice Ginsburg praises the E.U. Court. If a European Union-style world is what you want, you hate the Constitution and Bill of Rights and deserve to lose your freedoms to Hillary.

copyright 2007 Lisa Richards

www.lisa-richards.com

E-mail: lisa-richards@lisa-richards.com

NUTS TOSSED OVER THE CUCKOO’S NEST

BY LISA RICHARDS

October 1, 2007

Yes, I’m talking about the Clintons again. As if it weren’t enough that we had to hear about Bill exposing “his” in the Oval Office for eight long years, now we have Hillary trying to shove her big tush back in the doors of the White House while attempting to rob every American tax-payer of more money for lazy parents.

According to Madame Romanov, she would like every child born on U.S. soil to receive a check for $5,000 dollars, which will be put into an account collecting interest—off tax-payers of course—until the child reaches age 18. Those children Americans will have to forcibly hand money over to could include children of illegal aliens. Hillary did not state children of illegals would be included in her proposal, but anyone with a brain knows illegally born children will be bought for votes if Clinton’s proposal can make it to Washington.

How lovely. It’s not enough the free-loading thieves of America crash our borders stealing our jobs and paychecks every April 15^th, after crossing our lines while dropping babies on our soil in the process of invasion, the Mexican takeover might get paid for illegally birthing brats.

If that sounds too harsh for readers, too bad; Hillary Clinton is trying to pick America’s pockets for lazy welfare Hispanic/black/illegal votes.

This is also Hillary’s socialist attempt to return America to Lyndon Johnson’s Great Society when women who refused to work for a living were paid by hijacked taxpayers to have babies for a living. Welfare mother’s made a lot of money popping out babies for cash. Hillary wants them to have a chance to do so again.

What a nice career for young women: opt out of high school and college; make money getting pregnant; whore yourself for Hillary votes. Don’t all you gals out there dream of aspiring to yearly profitable taxpayer pregnancies? Gosh, women of suffrage would be so proud.

Oh, here’s the best part: it’s estimated this nutty sham could cost Americans $20 billion in taxes. We already pay $50 billion annually in welfare taxes to illegals alone. That would up the welfare lottery to $70 billion more annually, and that doesn’t include all welfare recipients.

After readers have calmed down, read the next paragraph.

According to Hillary, she “like[s] the idea of giving every baby born in America a $5,000 account that would grow over time, so when that young person turns 18, if they have finished high school, they would be able to access it to go to college.”

This is welfare every way you look at it and slice it.  These kids are not going to go to college if this attempt at a LBJ bill gets passed. The kids will cash the money and use it as down payments on black sports cars with dark tinted windows and 4X5 foot speakers in the trunks blaring voodoo drumbeats to loud, pounding bass rhythms.

P.S., this is also European Socialism. Europe is a welfare haven and many E.U. states are broke as a result of post WWII welfare for life. Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher thought the E.U. was crazy to keep welfare for life for anyone in Britain. Then again, I’m speaking of the great Iron Lady who had more class than Miss Manners. Hillary is no lady; a Hun in pantsuits, but no lady.

I wonder if Maggie Thatcher would like to run against Hillary.

Hillary claims her plan will enable future 18 year-olds to put down-payments on homes with the $8,512 dollars in interest accumulated over 18 years.

Where does anyone in America put eight grand down on a home; Mo and Curly’s trailer Park in the hills of Eastern Kentucky?  18 years from now, eight grand will be worth two cents Hillary. But taxpayers will have the privilege of saying they spent $20 billion yearly to purchase homes for the children of the lazy.

Hillary also claims her plan will help these paid-for-by-the-taxpayers children pay for college tuition. Yeah, right. Hillary Clinton, do you have any idea what college tuition costs per semester in the U.S.? Do you understand most colleges now cost $150,000 dollars for a Bachelor’s degree? Do you realize the five to six books per class cost $50 to $150 dollars per book? Did taxpayers pay for Chelsea’s degree? Do you give a flying flip that eight grand in 18 years probably won’t buy one semester’s worth of books?

Again; this is Hillary’s way of reinstituting LBJ’s Great Society back into America and what author Marvin Olasky stated in The Tragedy of American Compassion as  something considered degradation by all races before 1960: “Until the 1960’s,” Olasky said,  “the public dole was humiliation. Soon young men would be told that shining shoes was demeaning, and that accepting government subsidy meant a person could at least keep his dignity.”

So it starts again. Convincing a certain group of Americans they never have to work for a living when there are taxpayers to pay the way.

In FDR’s New Legacy is the Life of the Lie, author Jacob G. Hornberger stated: the “New deal [enacted by FDR] ‘rejected’ America’s foundations of the values of freedom and equality making many live what might be called ‘the life of the lie’ or the life that denies reality.” If people would wake up, they would realize Hillary Clinton is trying to deny blacks and Hispanics a normal life in order to become president.

And for the record, it was Madame Romanov’s husband Bill who was forced to sign the August 22, 1996 bill titled Personal Responsibility And Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act—PRWORA—into law, dismantling the deteriorating welfare system. According to the Administration For Children & Families, Clinton’s PRWORA demanded twenty-five percent of all welfare recipients in each state enter the workforce after two years assistance. Single parents had to work twenty hours a week for the first year of welfare assistance, thirty hours the second year, becoming full-fledged members of the work-force.

Now presidential hopeful Hillary wants Americans to pay for the birthing of other people’s children. While you’re at it Madame Romanov, why not just give the kids the title papers to every American taxpayers home—minus the mortgage payments of course—we wouldn’t want welfare recipients to feel they owe anyone a living.

 According to Professor Thomas Sowell, Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institute: “there is a fundamental difference between seeking the truth and scoring points. In politics, the truth is strictly optional and that also seems to be true in parts of the media” In Sowell’s article “Myths of the Rich,” he speaks of how the media and politicians convince minorities that they are poor and always will be. Therein lays the brainwashing-into-welfare.

Hillary and all liberals need poor people. Liberals will be out of jobs if Americans—especially black and Hispanics on welfare—wake up and realize liberals do not want them rich, educated and holding their heads up high. Liberals need ghettoed poor blacks and Hispanics voting democrat; liberals need uneducated blacks and Hispanics to never rise up out of poverty liberals like Hillary keep them in for the race-card vote.

Now Hillary wants as many American—and don’t doubt illegal children will be included—born into welfare as possible. It’s the only way she can grab the low-income black and Hispanic vote and take over America.

Hey, Britney, maybe if you promise Hillary a vote, she’ll buy your kids off K-Fed.

copyright 2007 Lisa Richards

www.lisa-richards.com

E-mail: lisa-richards@lisa-richards.com

COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY TAKES AMERICA HOSTAGE:

ACADEMIC GROUNDS FOR TREASON

BY LISA RICHARDS

September 25, 2007

Once, very long ago in America, treason was something to be abhorred. Today it is admired and aspired to. Treason is akin to women at shoe sales: grab as much as you can and don’t look back. Then flaunt your actions while your husband weeps over the credit card bill.

Let me now state with utmost categorical belligerence: I hate Mahmoud Ahmadinedjad. Not only is he a terrorist ruling a terror-run nation funneling money and weapons to terrorists killing U.S. troops, he is the man responsible for invading the American Embassy in Iran in 1979, taking United States citizens and holding them hostage for 444 days.

He is also the man who helped over throw the Shah of Iran, a friend to America whom Jimmy Carter back-stabbed, letting Ahnadinedjad revolt against freedom, capture U.S. citizens, and put the Ayatollah Khomeini in power placing Iran under theological Islamic freakish rule.

I have never forgiven Ahmadinedjad and his crony revolutionaries for what they did to America’s people. I never will. He deserves nothing but the same treatment he inflicts upon Jews, Christians and U.S. troops fighting for world freedom from Islamic nuts. He deserves what his people chant in the streets—death.

Further insult has been added to a 28 year-old injury: Columbia University’s President Bollinger had the utter gall and treasonous indecency to invite the murderous terror-monger as an honored guest speaker on campus. This is the same campus which refused to let the founder of the anti illegal immigration group Minutemen Project James Gilchrist speak, forcing him off stage, because Gilchrist is against illegal aliens in America.

Columbia University is against Gilchrist’s beliefs, they are however not against Mahmoud Ahmadinedjad’s murderous principles of killing off every non-Muslim on the planet he’s trying to blow up.

Mr. Bollinger, why don’t you just hand the ba****d the keys to the city?  Better yet, why not give him what he truly wants—our entire American heads on the death platter.

How dare you Columbia U; how dare you Mr. Bollinger; How dare you do that to our brave citizens who endured well over a year under that brute’s fowl imprisonment; how dare you invite a monster who threatens America with nuclear warfare on to your campus. How dare you Mr. Bollinger invite the man whose people chant “death To America” in the streets, while Ahmadinedjad smiles in agreement, into the halls of American academia with a ceremony of honor fit for the President of the United States you probably hate because Bush loves Jews and freedom.

Columbia University is not exercising free speech. Mahmoud Ahmadinedjad has no rights to free speech in the U.S.; he has no right to be heard. Columbia is promoting treason while kissing up to a man known to be responsible for helping Iraq insurgents killing U.S. troops. Columbia University is a disgrace and every student and professor supporting this evil man’s visit are shameful, reprehensible, seditious agitators to terror.

In a city predominantly Jewish, Columbia invited a man who openly and proudly denies the Holocaust. That tells me those professors and students honored to have a terrorists as their guest on campus don’t believe 10 million Jews were massacred less than 100 years ago by a human killing machine. Mahmoud Ahmadinedjad is a human killing machine on his way to becoming the next Adolf Hitler and Columbia University is encouraging the maniacal dictator’s endeavors to annihilate mankind because he loves the murder.

Every Jewish Alumnus should permanently withhold money to Columbia University.

Let’s be honest here; we all know why this turban-toting terror monger came to New York to speak at the liberal Columbia University: to spew out liberal rhetoric puked daily by Air America, Daily Kos, liberal loons on the House and Senate floor, and Hollywood foreign policy strategist extraordinaire’s. The man is loved by liberals; therefore Ahmadinedjad promotes their crazy instability through the expulsion of his own insanity. The invitation simply justifies the madman’s actions.

The fiend spoke directly to the Middle East. Make no mistake about that. His audiences, his disciples, are terrorists in the Middle East rallying round their TV’s and radios to hear their great Messiah of maniacal muck-racking “Down With America” spewing lies. Liberals consider the murdering Hitler-in-the-making a poor misunderstood Muslim in need of tolerance for peace with Iran. Therefore we must let the homely ba****d speak freely in American schools with hopes of indoctrinating students to fascism.

Let’s take a look at what dish-rag wearing nuke-hurler had to say to the oh so hateful America: first, Bollinger criticized Ahamdinedjad for ten minutes in the opening address, basically calling the terror leader a murderer, something Ahmadinedjad took as a grievous offense. Bollinger did not need to hold a thugathon to make those accusations; he should have simply held an International Relations conference for the school, speaking out against Iran without inviting a terrorist to answer Bollinger’s questions.

Gee, too bad Yale didn’t think to invite Adolf Hitler to speak in 1942.

Ahamdinedjad’s speech and answers to questions were so pathetic, he made Paris Hilton’s consistent use of “like” a good reason to hand illiterates PhD’s in English Rhetoric.

The entire diatribe was a rant about science and the apparent fact the Holocaust has never been researched since WWII. “Humans would always have remained stranded in ignorance…the nature of man is granted by the Almighty to all.” To all; even Jews, Christians, women and gays? And thus began the psycho pseudo-Evangelical rant by a man who wouldn’t know God if he tripped head first over the Almighty’s feet.

I’ve attended many academic speeches by diplomats, British MP’s, U.S. leaders, and everyone has spoken intelligently, even those I’ve disagreed with. But this lunatic made no sense because he had no intentions of speaking sensibly. His entire reason for the visit was to infect liberal Jane Fonda-ettes minds with more lies for his own propagandist purpose—to kill us all if he can.

On went the science speech and how “real science rescues humans from ignorance.” Real liberal science would have helped us all when your mother was pregnant with you, you s.o.b.

“Realities of the world,” the loon stated, “are not limited to the material…selfishness does not allow some to accept reality…material desires place humans against realities.” That right there was a direct slam toward U.S. capitalism. Ahmadinedjad was condemning the U.S. for wealth which feeds, cloths, and doctors the world, including his people who flee from his brutalities. I notice the terrorist had no problem taking Iran’s material possessions in 1979 when forcing Iranians to become slaves to the Ayatollah Khomeini.

He further spewed that “bullying powers [meaning the U.S.] create non-existent threats,” further alleging the U.S. made WMD’s and misuses science for our “big powers.”

Oh how I wish we would.

“Some big powers,” he claimed, “stop other nation’s development” of nukes. He wants to know why some nations are trying to stop Iran from having nukes. Gee, I wonder why? Could it be because you’re Hitler in the making and you want to blow up the world?  

I swear I was watching Jane Fonda in a beard. The only thing missing was a tank for photo opts.

Then insane-Jane-in-a-beard declared: “the biggest God-given gift is scientific knowledge.” No Mr. Terror that is not the biggest gift from God. Salvation through Jesus Christ is the greatest God-given gift. Something you’ll never get since you kill off his people.

The next bombastic lie was a blathering harangue promoting Palestinians as humbly lovely people and Jews as nasty Arab-killers. Apparently, if the Holocaust actually had happened, “why don’t we have sufficient evidence? Why aren’t we researching the 1930’s and 40’s from a different perspective” than that of Jews? “We research chemistry, but not a historical event that was catastrophic. If it’s reality, why are Palestinians paying for the Holocaust? They did not commit any crimes in WWII.” And on he went telling Columbia how horrible Palestinians suffer because of the Holocaust. I thought the Holocaust never happened?

Stupid me, and I thought Jews were put into gas chambers by Nazis. So it was Palestinians? What an a**. Palestinians have been attacking Jews for decades. Jews are fighting back against a group of people who declared they want to drive Israeli’s into the sea.

The problem is the poor, homely, little terrorist has no access to books, TV, magazines, etc., or he would know the Holocaust is researched daily with more and more proof showing it happened. Not to mention Hitler filmed and photographed every atrocity he committed with great pride. But terrorists must defend each other from those nasty Jews.  

The anti-Christ declared Iran wants to be independent, “so don’t interfere with us.”

Is that a threat I hear?

Of course he flipped like a Kerry professing “Iran loves all nations; Iran is a peaceful, loving nation.”

Yes, we Americans know. You showed us great love in 1979 when you loved our people for 444 days. I say we reciprocate Ahmadinedjad’s love. Let’s kidnap him and love him like a Bundy.

Again, the freak told Columbia “no one should interfere with Palestinian affairs…allow Palestinians to decide for themselves.” That comment got a rousing applause from the liberal snots. It’s amazing what $150,000 gets one’s children—stupidity, stupidity, and more stupidity. And lots of beer, of course.

When asked why he provided aid to terrorists, Ahmadinedjad answered by asking if someone comes and blows you up, how would you treat them? “Iran is a victim of terrorism.” the murderer complained. “We don’t need to resort to terror, but we’re victims of terror.” Then stated “Iran loves all people and loves all the Jews in Iran,” claiming Jews live freely and unmolested in Iran. Yeah right.

Those loved Jews thank you for killing them.

My favorite answer was Ahmadinedjad’s answer to his mistreatment of women and homosexuals. For ten minutes he went on and on about how well-treated Iranian women are, ignoring the question about gays. He simply insisted women are equal to men in Iran. When asked again about his mistreatment of homosexuals, the homo-hater declared: “In Iran we have no homosexuals. We do not have that type of phenomena in Iran. I don’t know where you got that idea” that homosexuals exist in Iran.

Sorry Rosie, you have no home in Iran. You don’t exist; you are however a phenomena.

That one comment was the one to anger the little liberal snots of academia: the fact homosexuality was called non-existent phenomena. Not the fact the man commits crimes against humanity.

Bollinger defended his invite of the ruler of the largest terror-run state today by declaring even though he finds Ahmadinedjad “offensive and odious,” having the dictator speak at Columbia University depicts “America at its best”  further admitting he would have invited Adolf Hitler to speak.

Bollinger really needed his students to listen to the long-winded fulminate of an insane, brutal, anti-Semitic dictator hell-bent on world annihilation? No sir, you did not need to turn traitor to engage in talk about Iran. You could have spoken on your own. Better yet Mr. Bollinger, you should have invited Holocaust survivors to speak to your students. Then the truth would have been told.

Bollinger is the worst example of academic failure in America. I’m still waiting for liberal dem politicians to denounce Columbia for treasonous behavior. So far Hillary keeps dodging questions about the speech. Wow, Suha and Yasser Arafat’s girlfriend not denouncing an Arab terrorist; I’m shocked. As for Ahmadinedjad wanting peace: how bout’ we drop an A-Bomb on him and his nuke plants. I know Israel would gladly help. Life would sure be peaceful without that ugly toad.

copyright 2007 Lisa Richards

www.lisa-richards.com

E-mail: lisa-richards@lisa-richards.com

THE FLYING NUN HITS THE GROUND:

SYBIL TAKES OVER

BY LISA RICHARDS

September 21, 2007

I never watch awards shows. They’re nothing more than fashion show spectacles for the beautiful people to be seen and fawned over as they pretend to be oh so humbled for receiving an award for acting. I would rather watch Keith Olbermann, and that’s saying something since his show is how I punish my dog if the dog does naughty-naughty—I make the dog listen to Keith for an hour versus O’Reilly whom my dog loves.

Of late, awards shows have turned into United Nations free-for-alls for the 60’s generation has-beens who missed out on protest marches because mommy made them act on TV. Now the pampered snots who never got to be Jane Fonda have decided the Emmys and Oscars are a fabulous place to play Jane on a tank. And Sally Field has become the next walking foot-in-mouth-disease to accept an award with an anti-war statement that sounded like one of Sybil’s personalities on crack.

According to Field, if all the mothers on earth were in control of the world there would never be war. So claimed the off-balance actress to an audience of wanna’ be foreign policy strategists who think RPG stands for Really Pricey Gucci. I think Sybil’s liberal side needs an RPG in the rear.

Note to Sally: Queen Boudica of the Britons once ruled her land and annihilated the living daylights out of the Romans three times before her own demise; Joan of Arc became general of a French army and whipped to clotted cream out of the British before the church burned her alive at the stake; Protestant Queen Elizabeth I was a brilliant war strategist and leader with no guilt-feelings about going to war or executing her cousin Mary Queen of Scots out of revenge, thus preventing Mary from reinstituting Catholicism into Elizabeth’s now Protestant country; Golda Maier threatened the King of Jordan that if Jews did not get Palestine land as an Israeli State her people would fight to the death for it; Madeline Albright went after Slobodan Milosevic like a mad dog during the Bosnian/Kosovo wars under Clinton—she then gave autographed footballs to dictator Kim Jung IL;  Cleopatra was no wimp when it came to holding her throne and killing anyone trying to take Egypt before eventually killing herself. And need I remind anyone who Eva Peron was? The lousy actress whose only true goal was to be president and control the people she pretended to love.

And let’s not forget the infamous Hill and Bill Oval Office Lamp Wars.  It is said many a lovely and innocent brass and Tiffany glass lamp lost its life during Hillary’s carpet tossing campaign.

Need I go on Gidget?  Women are ruthless when it comes to war. Shakespeare himself said “hell hath no fury like a woman scorned.” That scorning goes for female leaders angered by other world leaders. If one must come up against an enemy in battle, trust me as a woman telling male readers this: you would rather fight men than women. We girls may be ladies, but we’re bitches and hell-bent when anger hits; so look out when women are in power.

I think Norma Ray needs to adjust her Sister Batrille habit; she’s hitting ground head first and turning into Sybil.

But Sally Field is not the only liberal Hollywood voice brainwashing today’s American generation into believing war is bad and making nice with enemies is good. Hollywood is home to a host of paranoid imbeciles with no education beyond their liberal echo chamber of reading Betty Freidan books, writing checks to George Soros and Barbara Streisand, hosting lavish parties for candidates against rich people while paying homage to Hollywood communists.

To Hollywood, freedom is the expression of them and them only. The rest of us can shut up, follow along or go straight to hell. I’m surprised Hollywood hasn’t erected a statue in honor of Jane Fonda. They could call it The Mother of Communism, have Sally Field unveil it and Sheryl Crowe could smash a bottle of French Champagne over Fonda’s head.

Up until now I’ve wanted to put my fingers down my throat every time I hear or see news clips of awards show acceptance speeches. But Sally Field’s blathering blunder of pathetic oration was so exposing of her naiveté along with the stupidity of her cheering peers, I want these imbeciles to continue spewing their anti-war/anti-conservative rhetoric. The more they yak and natter off like the crazies they are, the further they expose their inanity; and that’s great for conservatives.

Once, there was a time when Hollywood enlisted and fought for America—think WWII and Jimmy Stewart, Audie Murphy, Tyrone Power, etc. When the 60’s came, Jane Fonda invaded earth and John Kerry left his beloved France and patriotism subsided while Kerry held a throwing contest and Jane pretended to be Betty Page in camo. Thank God we have Bruce Willis who did try to enlist in 2003, but was rejected due to his age. Bruce, you’re a great American; the kind your peers should return to being.

Hope of Hollywood returning to the days of WWII is gone. They turned traitor in the 1950’s siding with Stalin and Khrushchev, but got away with treason making the great Senator McCarthy look traitorous for picking on poor little actors who should be worshiped for owning golden statues.

The golden hero worship continues as Brad Pitt And Angelina Jolie campaign for the UN and its continuation of raping African children white Hollywooders love to purchase for accessories; the idolizing of Michael Moore who has dimwits believing healthcare under Fidel Castro’s Cuba is exceptional; Susan Sarandon convincing Americans to march against war because apparently it’s far better to have men like Saddam Hussein and Mahmoud Ahmadinedjad on the loose than dead; Danny Glover and the banana boat buffoon Harry Belafonte hugging and kissing Hugo Chaves and Fidel Castro whom Hollywood considers liberators for enslaving human beings under brutal communistic regimes; And Sean Penn who’s going to save terrorists in Iraq—by photographing the legless bodies terrorists blew up—from the evil George Bush who had the utter gall to free an enslaved nation, capture Saddam, allow the brute to hang for crimes against humanity, then turn Iraq over to its people for free elections.

My gosh; how evil is that? At least Eva Peron had enough sense to kill her own people who refused to follow her lead versus going after brutal dictators. Oh wait: that means Eva hated everybody, so Sally Field is right: if the mothers of the world were in charge, there would be no wars, just b*tch-control.

So to men who actually believe Sally Field, let me remind you that women get PMS and then spend years going through Menopause. And we’re not nice during those moments; we’re angry, which is why we could blast the Ship In High Transit out of the enemy if we get mad enough.

It’s also another reason to think twice about Hillary Clinton, another lousy actress, as President Peron. That “she-man” has had PMS since her Wellesley days, making me believe that if Bill prefers living in another state far from his wife I don’t want that “mother” in charge of this nation.

copyright 2007 Lisa Richards

www.lisa-richards.com

E-mail: lisa-richards@lisa-richards.com

LIBERALS AND WAR SUCCESS:

IT’S SORT OF LIKE TRYING TO SQUEEZE TOOTHPASTE BACK INTO THE TUBE—IT NEVER WORKS

BY LISA RICHARDS

September 13, 2007

I love how Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton want to know the exact date of the pull-out in Iraq. I think Hillary should refrain from using phrases like pull-out, especially with a husband who’s an expert on the subject. And Barack Obama who has about as much experience in anything governmental as Paris Hilton on a three-day drunk trying tell Americans how not to drink and drive, asked questions so absurd he actually made Ted Kennedy appear sober; if that’s possible.

If the questions had been directed at the fired-by Bill Clinton General Wesley Clarke, you can be sure Harry Reid would have been fawning with drool over the bad-tempered liberal who screwed up a Clinton war so bad even Clinton had to ignore the blue-dress whore under the desk to take time out to issue a pink slip to the General the Clinton’s would later go on to endorse as a presidential candidate.

Petreaus is under direct order from Bush and not a liberal democrat, and the past three days of grand-standing do-nothing-but-whine was proof liberals can’t stand any bit of success Bush is having in Iraq. Liberals want Iraq to fail. They want Muslim terrorists to slaughter our troops like pigs. The want Sheryl Crowe sitting atop an enemy tank posing for photos ala’ Jane Fonda. Hell, if they can get Fonda to do a retake of her Hanoi hoopla, liberals would be in propaganda heaven.

Every time we have successes in Iraq—and it’s been a lot, but you wouldn’t know from the news media who thrives on the excitement of death and negativity—our efficacious productiveness is shot down, calling our brave men and women murders of those poor Iraqi citizens they’ve slaughtered by the tens of thousands. That’s all? Only tens of thousands; I’m disappointed. I was hoping for more so we could clean the region of a bunch of a**inine tribes with flags.

The entire Congressional/Senate hearing accomplished nothing but slamming our military for doing a great job. There was nothing but anti-military/anti-American sentiment spewing from the mouths of a bunch of imbeciles with no guts to don a uniform themselves and try to do what our troops are willing to do for us. There was no credit given for the General’s efforts, which should have been met with praise. How many people have the guts to do what these brave men and women do? I know I don’t, that’s why I admire our military and I’m eternally grateful they’re willing to sacrifice themselves so I have a free life.

I’m surprised today John Kerry and Jane Fonda aren’t organizing a throwing contest in downtown D.C. I’m surprised Bill Clinton isn’t handing out Oxford University pamphlets at the local New York Universities. I’m surprised Hillary didn’t regale the panel with illustrious stories of her pseudo-attempts to enlist in the Marine Corps. “I have poor eyesight; I wear glasses; the Marines don’t allow anyone who wears glasses to enter their military.”

Actually that would have been an interesting unit had she been allowed to join: The All Lesbian Brigade of Sapphism Sanguinary led by Wellesley College’s very own hemp-wearing, saggy-tittied, hairy-arm-pitted dubious dyke Hillary Rodham. By the way, if that man wins, that’s what America has to look forward to—an America-hating socialist who wants the military disbanded.

Was there really anything to be garnered from the entire broo ha ha other than James Webb’s glorious regaling of Viet Nam? Let’s not let one day go by without making every topic Viet Nam. Liberals can’t survive without two things: Viet Nam and poverty. Without the two, they’re out of jobs.

Did a bunch of over-paid politicians who’ve never worked a day in their lives actually accomplish one, single task on their pathetic platform of spectatorship questionnaires? No; they wasted time and tax-payers dollars while trashing an organization all liberals hate and want disbanded—the U.S. military. All that was missing from the hearing was Ron Paul’s wussy cantankerous moaning.

The only noteworthy and in-depth interview with Petreaus was Monday evening’s Brit Hume interview with Petreaus and Crocker. At least Hume let the two men speak for the entire hour, asked legit and intellectual questions and as a result, answers were allowed to be given without interruption from some jackass afraid of not getting enough camera exposure.

And Washington wonders why there is something called voter apathy? It’s because they act like the anti-Christ on Ducolax.

 copyright 2007 Lisa Richards

www.lisa-richards.com

TO LENO OR NOT TO LENO

EVEN SHAKESPEARE WOULDN’T ASK SUCH A DUMB QUESTION

BY LISA RICHARDS

September 10, 2007

Apparently Senator Fred Thompson has upset America and the state of New Hampshire more than MacDonald’s going non-trans fat. Instead of showing up for the Durham, New Hampshire Republican Debate on September 5, 2007, Thompson committed a faux pas worse than wearing white after Labor Day; he appeared on the Tonight Show with Jay Leno to announce his candidacy for the Presidency of the United States: “I’m running for President of the United States” the Senator told a happy crowd.

And suddenly, without warning, pigs flew and hell froze over; New Hampshire was ready to make Fred Thompson live without freedom and die.

As if anyone should care where the man announced his candidacy; but apparently New Hampshire was snubbed to the greatest of insult. The fact anyone would ignore a state full of old 60’s Birkenstock-wearing, tie-dye T-shirt wearing hippies whose vote counts more than anyone else in America was more than anyone who spent the entire 1960’s high on LSD could bare. And debate moderators Brit Hume, Chris Wallace and Wendell Goller considered the topic of Fred Thompson’s absence more important than the catching Osama bin Laden.

Governor Mike Huckabee compared Senator Thompson to “No Show” George Jones; Senator McCain claimed “We’re way up past Fred’s bedtime;” Mitt Romney sarcastically stated: “What’s the hurry? Why not wait until January or February?” Actually Mitt, if any of you had sense; you all would have ignored Obama and Hillary’s jump-the-gun run and waited until the normal January 2008 announcement time. Mayor Giuliani declared about Thompson: “This is a nomination you have to earn. This is not a time to elect someone who will have on-the-job-training…America’s at war.”

The idiotic questions didn’t end there; the candidates were asked if they could forgive Larry Craig of his scandal?

Sam Brownback said Craig has “already pulled the trigger,” further stating the Republican Party needs to stand for family values...[and] rebuild the family…[and] be bolder about standing up for the family.” Duncan Hunter was more firm: “He [Craig] should resign.”

And on went the answers to the Craig scandal, which were as absurd as Craig’s guilty plea to something he states he did not do. I almost expected questions like this to erupt from the stupidity: “and gentlemen, what do you think of Michael Vick hanging dogs after he made them murder other dogs? And what do you men think about Vick’s declarations of finding Jesus; do you think he’s saved or hell-bound? And how many of you candidates think Paris Hilton would make a fabulous spokesperson for Mother’s Against Drunk Drivers? And speaking of important people to national policy; is Britney Spears a fit mother? Should K-Fed get custody of their children; do any you think Larry Birkhead and Howard K. Stern really are lovers; and tell us gentlemen, do any of you think Osama bin Laden looks better with the Grecian Formula or his natural grays?”

Obviously the National Enquirer was writing the first questions.

As far as the real debate went, after we got beyond Fred’s Leno-gate and Craig’s bathroom pick-up-gate, the same old same old questions were posed: Illegal Immigration, Sanctuary Cities, Abortion, Marriage—gay versus straight, Iraq, Presidential Power and the War on Terror; should Gitmo Bay stay opened; Executive Powers, Taxes—Fair Tax or higher taxes on the disgustingly evil rich; Government Spending, Family Values, and Iran.

There was nothing new in the questions; it was the same as every debate. But this debate had one highlight that made the entire thing worth watching: Mike Huckbee in a smack-down with a man who actually makes Dennis Kucinich appear normal: Dr. Ron Paul.

The subject was Iraq, and as everyone who watches the republican debates knows, Ron Paul does not believe in a military; he wants it abolished along with the CIA, FBI, Homeland Security and everything else securing America’s safety. Basically Paul wants a free country ruled by out-of-order nobody hippie dolts controlling the country from their Sci-Fi collection library in their mother’s basements.

And thus began the political version of the WWE. Ron Paul lost it. Come to think of it, the scrawny little chicken-necked miser lost it long ago and needs to self-medicate. Huckabee’s fists hit the podium exclaiming we are one nation under God, which sat as well as a toupee on James Traficant’s head. Paul began to shout back about correcting our mistakes he considers to be caused by America’s inept foreign policy. The in-your-face rhetoric continued with no possible intervention. Huckabee had enough of the kicked-in-the-head lack-luster liberal libertarian declaring if America does things Paul’s way, we’re going to lose the Republican Party and the country.

Actually Paul can’t be blamed for any loss in support; the party is shooting it’s self in the foot.

Paul shouted to Huckabee: “We have no need for troops on the Arabian Peninsula…we need a new foreign policy that says we need to mind our own business [in world affairs]!”

Concerning Iraq and Paul’s insistence we pull out now Huckabee demanded: “Congressman, whether or not we should have gone to Iraq is a discussion for historians, but we’re there. We bought it because we broke it. We’ve got a responsibility to the honor of this country and the honor of every man and woman who has served in Iraq and our military to not leave them with anything less than the honor they deserve.”

Paul angrily insisted: “The American people didn’t go in. A few people advising this administration, a small number of people called the neoconservatives, hijacked our foreign policy. They are responsible, not the American people.”

Dr. Paul, if the American people did not go in, who are those troops wearing U.S. uniforms in Iraq; Johnny Depp and the French?

To Paul’s absurdity Huckabee interjected the big no-no of all no-no’s; God: “Congressman, we are one nation. We can’t be divided. We have to be one nation under God. That means if we make a mistake, we make it as a single country…Even if we lose elections, we should not lose our honor.”

Now why can’t all debates be like that; one-on-one smack-downs? The question and answers from moderators are always too redundant and quite frankly boring except when Tom Tancredo gets a chance to answer, which is about once every millennium. If anyone worried over Thompson not showing up, they need not have bothered; the brawl was worth staying up late for.

When Tancredo got his chance at illegal immigration and sanctuary cities he let everyone on the stage have it, noting that until that night he was the only candidate fighting illegal immigration, shouting against illegal immigration and working against it. Tancredo noted that suddenly every candidate is for secure borders when they’ve been against them all along. Then turning to his fellow candidates: “It’s nothing to do with disliking people coming into this country and everything to do with the rule of law. Do you understand that?” he heatedly asked.

On the War on Terror, Tancredo was the only person with the guts to call the war what it really is: “The war is not actually in Iraq, it’s with radical Islam…we were not attacked because we had troops in Saudi Arabia, we were attacked because Islam wants to destroy America.” Tancredo went further declaring “If we capture people who have information, we should water-board [them]. It’s not torture. We have to do whatever to keep America safe. I would go to great lengths to keep this country safe.”

Tancredo noted that when it comes to the political correctness adopted by Washington, “political correctness will get us all killed.” Wisely put since we are on the sixth anniversary of 9/11.

Of course none of Tancredo’s words sat well with McCain, who insists places like Guantanimo Bay are the reason our troops are being captured and tortured. Never mind the fact Muslims have been kidnapping our people for decades and torturing and killing them because the diabolical Koran dictates Muslims commit atrocities against non-Muslims and the world; it’s all Bush’s fault terrorism and torture exists at all.

As usual, the entire debate focused on the beliefs, or rather the latest beliefs, of Mitt, Rudy, and McCain. Tancredo, whom I feel is the best candidate because he never wavers on conservative values, was never allowed to voice an opinion beyond three answers. Apparently the conservative is too conservative for the once conservative Republican Party. I guess the party doesn’t want a no-holds-bar tough guy. So far the party is going with the pretty guy, the mob-whacker and the no-torture-in-a-tutu twit.

I have a fantasy about the next debate rolling around inside my brain: the giant linebacker-esque good ole’ boy Tennessean with the baritone voice Thompson versus the skinny little runt Paul. Just picture the smack-down go around: Fred Thompson leaning over the little libertarian liberal loon, who has no idea what being a libertarian means, and verbally smacking the Ship In High Transit out of the snot-nosed, get-us-all-killed for peace, peace-nick.

And I would like to see Bill O’Reilly and Dennis Miller moderate. They can have Geraldo Rivera come in for the questions on why the so-called illegals should be allowed to take over America.

copyright 2007 Lisa Richards

www.lisa-richards.com

E-Mail: www.lisa-richards@lisa-richards.com

CRIME AND GOD:

COMMIT ONE, FIND THE OTHER

BY LISA RICHARDS

September 6, 2007

Paris Hilton did it, now Michael Vick has followed suit; committing a crime then suddenly finding God in front of the media cameras. It’s the next best thing to rehab and it’s a great career booster.

How many times do we hear ad nauseam celebrities, violent thugs, politicians, etc., declaring they have out of the blue found Jesus after a fabulous time committing crime? Far too much for my tastes.

Paris went to prison for 23 days and precipitously discovered the bible. She claimed to have read the Good Book daily. When she made her first out-of-prison-public-appearance on Larry King live, King asked the dingbat to quote her favorite scripture; “What’s your favorite bible verse?” Paris was unable to quote one, single, simple scripture from any single book in the bible; Hilton looked at her hands while giving an answered: “Uh…..I don’t have one in particular.”

Oh come on; at least say “In the beginning God created the heavens and earth;” even an Atheist knows that verse.

Oh yeah, Paris found God and read the bible. And I prefer Wal-Mart over Bergdorf’s.

The next superstar ignoramus to unearth the existence of Jesus Christ and discover the money-making use of the Almighty’s name is dog-killer Michael Vick. After hanging dogs like a Clint Eastwood movie on steroids, Vick was smart enough, upon arrest and conviction, to quickly find Jesus for the enthralled media.

Yeah, I killed the rotten little mutts; hanged em’ high. But I want all of you suckers out their to know, even though I kill dogs for fun after forcing them to fight for money, I asked Jesus Christ to be my Lord and Savior. If any of you buy this, I have some battered dogs I’d have to get rid of fast.

Give me a break. This is the oldest stunt in the book; get caught, get Jesus fast.

Even Bill Clinton new how to put Jesus to good use when carrying his perfectly bound, unmarred and probably never opened bible to church every Sunday when president. Oh the media loved Clinton’s bible move. What a good Baptist; he takes a bible to church. Oh yes, he’s definitely a reformed and Born Again Christian—one hour every Sunday for the cameras.

Sorry Michael, sorry Paris, Christ and the bible don’t work that way; one actually has to be so repentant and in desperate need for redemption in their heart, they truly want Christ to take over and guide their life as their personal savior. Paris darling, that means giving up booze and every man with a video camera. Michael, it means truly being sorry you love to torture and murder animals after forcing them to murder each other. It also means changing your life-style to one conducive to morality. That includes actually opening up a bible and reading the Good Book versus using it to prop up your pretty little pink prison mirror.

Why is it every jerk who commits a crime has a sudden revelation of Jesus Christ and the bible? Could it be for publicity; could it be to present themselves in a far better light to the public they’ve alienated through their bad actions; or could it be Jesus is a fabulous career commodity? Yes, it’s all of the above.

What a joke. Paris Hilton wouldn’t know Jesus Christ if she tripped over him on the road to Damascus. In fact, if she were blinded by a flash of light as St. Paul was, Paris would assume the paparazzi pose position. Michael Vick would presume he was being pulled over by cops and assume the face down position.

Of course you won’t find Paris or Michael at an Evangelical Crusade weeping over the need to have Christ in their hearts. You will find Paris with a crusade of flash bulbs following her on the latest shopping spree while announcing to the paparazzi that drinking and driving is totally not hot, then telling the press she hopes all her fans, whom she considers herself to be a great role model to, will learn from her not so hot mistakes; then she’ll tell her flock to all go shopping at her new store in Beverly Hills which is totally hot.

Michael Vick will repent to the judge, probably go to rehab, come out to discuss animal rights, do a few PETA ads, then receive lesser pay—say, only 25 million per year—as punishment for doing cruel things to innocent puppies. He should have opened his own abortion clinic; he would have gotten off free and clear on the technicality babies are not human until they’re screaming in their cribs.

The other way to get off Scott-free for any offenses committed is to pull a Jim McGreevy; tell the world you’re gay so Hollywood and liberals will fall all over your feet demanding the world leave you alone. It’s the best way to stop an investigation into possible corruption.

If Michael Vick wants his crime to go away fast, he should pretend to be gay and Hollywood and the ACLU will force the courts to drop all charges in the name of Civil Rights violation toward a gay dog killer. If Paris wants to drink, drive and never get caught, marry a Kennedy.

Even Jesus can’t top the gay card or Kennedy money when it comes to getting out of scandals.

copyright 2007 Lisa Richards

www.lisa-richards.com